Monday, 17 September 2012
-
recommend
- recs 6
-
email
- sent 0
- like
Related Posts
Post a Comment
- Back to lonelywanderer2's Xanga Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in lonelywanderer2's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)
Comments (32)
haha, yup!!! I never understood that. We might as well just be wearing our underwear at the beach. There's no difference! lol
Well, for some of us, we only let the most privileged see the latter, and no one sees the former. So....
I've complained about this before. This perception is completely ridiculous.
hehehe. :)
lol that's so true. People's perception of what an "offensive image" is, is very weird anyway.
@Megabyyte - lol I do that. I once found the perfect bikini top on sale for 3 € or so, but no pants in my size. So I bought black underpants of a synthetic material and cut off a little bow they had at the front. You really don't notice the difference, unless you accually take it in your hands.
ROFL. The funniest thing is the underwear covers more.
||
this is something i have never been able to understand. and beach wear shows more! go figure!
I have said this for ages. I cannot fathom why women believe there is a difference. I suppose they equate underwear with being the closest to being naked since the underwear is the last thing they would take off as they undress before they are deemed to be naked. In other words, they consider underwear to be part of the undressing sequence before sex. Bikinis, not so as it is not often the women are taking off their bikinis before the act of sex. It does happen, but not often, whereas at all times women are removing their underwear before the act of sex. This is what probably leads to them being somewhat shy about it.
There is also the fact bikinis are somewhat thicker than underwear. No chance you will see the snatch. Not so with underwear. I have seen much snatch by gazing right through the panties. Nice view. Cannot do the same with bikinis.
Women also do not wish me to see any er 'stains' upon their panties, stains which do not show up on their bikinis. Pussy stains or even *gag* skidmarks.
I've never really understood the difference, either.
They both looks fine to me.
The lust in my heart goes beyond societal perception.
Yeah it makes no sense to me at all! Gees!!
This would be why I have friends who swim in shorts and tank tops over their swimwear.
My underwear shows more than my bikini lol soooooo
Yeah, kinda weird. Although, I don't wear bikinis. Also, I don't think I'd super freak out if people saw me in my underwear.
Perception is important. Nothing wrong with wearing a bakini! It's being seductive, that makes people think you're being lustful.
Yep!
bathing suit material is thicker but I get your point. ;) BTW why do men have no trouble showing their stuff? lol
You've got it wrong. In the second photo her hair is wet and not styled!!
Swimsuit bottoms are usually more substantial like someone above said, though I agree about the bras. Victorias Secret actually models their bikini tops after their bra lines. Also, swimsuits are meant to be seen--underwear isn't.
@wildchildofthebluemoon - I agree...
----------------------------------
I practice what I preach when it comes to these matters. Religion also has a lot to do with the perceptions you mention in the post, Lonelywanderer.
Great post.