Bullshit charges. Should all be dropped. A fetus is nothing more than a potential person it is not, and should not, be entitled to any sort of legal protection until it's born.
If anything, this doctor should be lauded because he prevented the potential people from tons of pain and suffering on a life on earth. Since it is, as I have irrefutably demonstrated time and time again, better never to have been brought into existence, he should be revered, not scorned.
It is butt ignorant to justify murdering someone just because they don't look like you or measure up to your pathetic standards.
The pro-abortion crowd tries to sell the myth that slaughtering unborn children is this clean and easy process that is no fuss no muss.
It turns out that doctors are presiding over raw, brutal carnage under slaughter house conditions.
@ImNotUglyIJustNeedLove - Life (even human life) does NOT equal or imply personhood. They are two totally different things. A human life form becomes a person upon live birth.
Seeing as how a fetus merely leeches off of its mother's body, depriving it of vital nutrients. In that light a fetus is but a parasite, and under no circumstances do parasites have the right to occupy their hosts' bodies against their wills.
@secretbeerreporter - Not bullshit charges. Unlike your country, here, in the United States, there is something called "the rule of law." Even though I agree with a woman's right of choice, under present law, what the doctor did was clearly illegal and he was rightfully charged and prosecuted.
Likewise, the human fetus possesses the nature of the human being.
Logically then, the fetus must be a human person.
You saying that the fetus does not possess personhood is just you expressing your personal opinion.
Human rights are only based on personal opinion in brutal tyrannies.
@ImNotUglyIJustNeedLove - Same old Curtis, same old tired arguments. I'm not impressed. Your arguments are all based on religion. Once you get some secular reasoning, then I'll pay attention to you.
@Celestial_Teapot - Screw the outdated law. The DA is still under no obligation whatsoever to prosecute the case. It is all up to the DA's discretion, and I'd bet my life savings on the fact this DA is a rabid anti-choice crusader.
@secretbeerreporter - If the law is indeed outdated and out of step with the will and mores of the people, then it would have been changed; but i thasn't been.
From what I've gathered in the conversation: we both agree that the law exists, the physician broke the law, and once prosecuted he was rightfully convicted. Your only defense is that the DA should have interjected his own personal views and allow a crime to go unpunished out of a subjective, unprofessional opinion.
@Celestial_Teapot - There are tons of laws that are still on the books yet unenforced. This is absolutely no different than any of those. If you really think everything should be prosecuted, so should those other largely ignored laws (most of which are utterly ridiculous).
@secretbeerreporter - My arguments come from a philosophical heritage thousands of years old.
Yours only come from yourself and a few like minded misfits.
And as a self admitted basket case of complete misery you have no call to be insulting or to feel superior.
@secretbeerreporter - If laws are not being enforced then the legal system is a shambles. A legal system in shambles means a society where injustice reigns.
@secretbeerreporter - "There are tons of laws that are still on the books yet unenforced. This is absolutely no different than any of those."
You make an irrelevent comparison.
Yes, there are archaic laws, obscure laws, and ignored laws. Abortion doesn't fall in any of those category. There is such active popular discussion and interest in abortion and abortion laws that they are essentially distinct.
The mere existance of uneforced laws doesn't mean that any single nitpicked law shoudl too be unenforced.
Comments (13)
Bullshit charges. Should all be dropped. A fetus is nothing more than a potential person it is not, and should not, be entitled to any sort of legal protection until it's born.
If anything, this doctor should be lauded because he prevented the potential people from tons of pain and suffering on a life on earth. Since it is, as I have irrefutably demonstrated time and time again, better never to have been brought into existence, he should be revered, not scorned.
@secretbeerreporter - The fetus is as human as you or I. Science says so.
It is butt ignorant to justify murdering someone just because they don't look like you or measure up to your pathetic standards.
The pro-abortion crowd tries to sell the myth that slaughtering unborn children is this clean and easy process that is no fuss no muss.
It turns out that doctors are presiding over raw, brutal carnage under slaughter house conditions.
@ImNotUglyIJustNeedLove - Life (even human life) does NOT equal or imply personhood. They are two totally different things. A human life form becomes a person upon live birth.
Seeing as how a fetus merely leeches off of its mother's body, depriving it of vital nutrients. In that light a fetus is but a parasite, and under no circumstances do parasites have the right to occupy their hosts' bodies against their wills.
@secretbeerreporter - Not bullshit charges. Unlike your country, here, in the United States, there is something called "the rule of law." Even though I agree with a woman's right of choice, under present law, what the doctor did was clearly illegal and he was rightfully charged and prosecuted.
@secretbeerreporter - An acorn possesses the nature of the oak tree.
Likewise, the human fetus possesses the nature of the human being.
Logically then, the fetus must be a human person.
You saying that the fetus does not possess personhood is just you expressing your personal opinion.
Human rights are only based on personal opinion in brutal tyrannies.
@ImNotUglyIJustNeedLove - Same old Curtis, same old tired arguments. I'm not impressed. Your arguments are all based on religion. Once you get some secular reasoning, then I'll pay attention to you.
@Celestial_Teapot - Screw the outdated law. The DA is still under no obligation whatsoever to prosecute the case. It is all up to the DA's discretion, and I'd bet my life savings on the fact this DA is a rabid anti-choice crusader.
@secretbeerreporter - If the law is indeed outdated and out of step with the will and mores of the people, then it would have been changed; but i thasn't been.
From what I've gathered in the conversation: we both agree that the law exists, the physician broke the law, and once prosecuted he was rightfully convicted. Your only defense is that the DA should have interjected his own personal views and allow a crime to go unpunished out of a subjective, unprofessional opinion.
@Celestial_Teapot - There are tons of laws that are still on the books yet unenforced. This is absolutely no different than any of those. If you really think everything should be prosecuted, so should those other largely ignored laws (most of which are utterly ridiculous).
@secretbeerreporter - My arguments come from a philosophical heritage thousands of years old.
Yours only come from yourself and a few like minded misfits.
And as a self admitted basket case of complete misery you have no call to be insulting or to feel superior.
@secretbeerreporter - If laws are not being enforced then the legal system is a shambles. A legal system in shambles means a society where injustice reigns.
@secretbeerreporter - "There are tons of laws that are still on the books yet unenforced. This is absolutely no different than any of those."
You make an irrelevent comparison.
Yes, there are archaic laws, obscure laws, and ignored laws. Abortion doesn't fall in any of those category. There is such active popular discussion and interest in abortion and abortion laws that they are essentially distinct.
The mere existance of uneforced laws doesn't mean that any single nitpicked law shoudl too be unenforced.
Comments are closed.